Church of England to increase oversight of abuse complaints - but stops short of creating independent body

The Church of England has voted to increase oversight of safeguarding measures – but stopped short of creating an independent body.

Members of the General Synod, the Church’s parliament, voted for the new measures for handling abuse allegations as it tries to restore trust among survivors after multiple scandals.

The motion was passed with 392 votes in its favour. Nine people voted against it – and there were six abstentions.

The five-day meeting of the Synod is the first since Justin Welby resigned as Archbishop of Canterbury amid condemnation over safeguarding failures.

He stood down in November after a report said he could and should have done more in the case of paedophile John Smyth – who for years sexually and physically abused more than 120 boys and young men.

The Bishop of Liverpool, John Perumbalath, has also just announced his retirement after accusations of sexual assault and harassment were made by two women – one a bishop. He denies any wrongdoing.

Survivors dismiss vote as ‘fudge’

Lisa Holland

Communities correspondent

@LisaatSky

‘High noon at Synod’ – as one contributor called it – came and went with the Church of England unwilling to grasp a total overhaul of its safeguarding policies.

There will be significant change over safeguarding. But even after repeated abuse scandals – including one which cost the job of the Archbishop of Canterbury who was forced to resign in disgrace – there still wasn’t a will to for the most far-reaching plan on the table.

Members of the General Synod – the church’s parliament – debated various models and argued over amendments. In the end it voted for what survivors of abuse called a ‘fudge’.

Repeatedly speakers at the Church’s parliament talked of the need to rebuild trust.

But there was confliction; division and suspicion over how that is done.

And there are clearly serious doubts about handing all safeguarding responsibility to an external body straight away.

Those who work with survivors believe this Synod wasted its opportunity. Bishops, clergy and laity also went against the recommendation of the most senior figures in the Church.

Perhaps all options miss the point that the Church needs an immediate culture change from within over safeguarding.

Is this vote about the practical ways to best implement safeguarding? Or does the ‘fudge’ vote mean the Church of England thinks it is above complete independent management and scrutiny?

Abuse lawyer David Greenwood said the result was “incredibly disappointing”.

He said: “Many have worked hard on the attempt to bring full independence to the church safeguarding process.

“This vote represents a rejection of secular standards in safeguarding and will lead to children continuing to be at risk in the church.”

Andrew Graystone, an advocate for abuse survivors, said the vote signalled the Church had decided to “keep it in the family”.

He said: “If you are abused by a vicar, you will still be expected to report it to a bishop.

“Safeguarding staff will still be located in church offices, employed by the very same bishop.

“The Church of England had an opportunity to start to rebuild trust, by admitting that it needed expertise from outside.

“But instead they have chosen to keep it in the family.

“Shocking arrogance, and a punch in the gut for victims and survivors of abuse.”

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

This article was originally published by Sky.com. Read the original article here.

Survivors dismiss vote as ‘fudge’

More on Church Of England

Related Topics: