Rwanda ‘disappointed’ at Supreme Court verdict on UK asylum scheme


Rwanda’s government has attacked what it called a “disappointing” verdict from the UK’s top court which ruled a scheme to deport asylum seekers to the African country was unlawful.

The UK government suffered a major setback over its Rwanda scheme when the plan was dismissed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

But a spokesperson for Rwanda’s government rejected the idea the East African country was unsafe for refugees, and argued there was “nothing wrong” with how it processes asylum claims.

Spokesperson Yolande Makolo told Sky News the judgment had been based on “hypocritical” and “dishonest” assessments by the UN’s refugee agency (UNHCR).

Asked what she made of the verdict, she said: “It’s ultimately a decision for the UK judicial system. It’s disappointing – we have a really good record of hosting and welcoming migrants and refugees in this country.”

Rwanda remains “committed” to the partnership and is “ready” to receive migrants, she said.

The Supreme Court had said in its unanimous judgment that those sent to Rwanda would be at “real risk” of being returned home, whether their grounds to claim asylum were justified or not – breaching international law.

More on Rwanda

Sky’s Mark Austin pressed Ms Makolo on this, to which she said the court had been referring to the risk of refoulment – the forcible return of refugees or asylum seekers to a country they could be subjected to persecution – and that this was based on “hypocritical criticism from the UNHCR”.

She said Rwanda had worked with the UNHCR for a “long time” and had not refouled anyone.

Rwanda government spokesperson Yolande Makolo

Austin then asked about another issue brought up by the Supreme Court, which said there had been an instance of Rwanda’s directorate-general of immigration dismissing 8% of claims without any written reason or right of appeal.

Ms Makolo said these were again examples given by the UNHCR that were “either dishonest or do not have the full context”.

She added that “any deficiencies they have found have been corrected since last year”.

The spokesperson said she thought the Supreme Court ruling was “political”, telling Austin: “It was not Rwanda being judged. Rwanda is not in the dock.”

Articles You May Like

Audi shares upgrades to off-road RS Q e-tron ahead of its third outing in the brutal Dakar Rally
Mercedes-Benz, BMW form JV to deploy a EV charger network, but not where you’d expect
Police investigate golden eagle’s disappearance – as officers believe bird ‘has come to harm’
BBC Newsnight to be cut to 30 minutes
Tesla Cybertruck needs separate battery pack in the bed to get the range it promised